I've already mentioned it so many times here that I had the privilege of being a liveblogger for TEDxDelft, but in this post I would like to focus on liveblogging itself. Two times I have liveblogged as of now, both at TEDxDelft (2011 and 2012), and I certainly have some take-home lessons that I would like to share with you.
First of all, I think liveblogging is unlike anything else. Writing at the brink of the moment not only causes incredible focus in me (I am going to tap into that zone for my thesis), it also helps me to think fast and build sentences in a snap.
Just like last year, I managed to write 4 entries for the website over the course of the day, and I did some tweeting along the way. But this year, I had a better plan, and I'd like to share that with you:
1. Preparation is key
Unlike last year, when I showed up, opened my laptop and gave it my best shot, we had a plan this year (thanks to our webcare team leader @marionvanputten). I knew exactly which performers I'd be writing about, and I had done my homework and researched them before the event. Although I still had to look up some things while writing the posts, I did feel much better prepared, and with more background knowledge.
2. You can't cover everything
Last year, I tried to listen to all talks, read all tweets, hear, see and follow everything around me - and in the afternoon I was completely overloaded and with writer's block. This year, I knew which performers to cover, and made these my priority.
3. Stop and pause
In between writing about the performers I was supposed to cover, I took a moment to let my mind wander, stretch my legs, make a phone call and refuel. This year I did not experience any writer's block at all.
4. The zone
To deliver the best liveblog posts on "my" performers, I went into the creativity zone from the moment the performer stepped on the stage to the moment I hit the "publish" button in WordPress. I followed every step, expression, word and emotion of the performer, made notes and started writing after the performance. At the moment that I started writing, I chose to block out all external noise and blast some loud music in my ears (Dark Tranquillity in the morning, random futurepop in the afternoon) - such that I could be away from the world and get going with writing. I managed to experience some incredible focus by doing so.
5. Don't forget to eat and drink
My take-home message for next time: don't forget to drink! I certainly didn't drink enough water during the event, so I woke up with a headache the next day. A mistake not to be made again!
6. Sit straight
Another take-home message: I should keep my toes warm and sit straight. After a day of hanging in a chair hunched over my laptop, I felt like an old lady with a broken back the next day. My feet got cold and rained out in the morning, and sitting still made all joints from the hip to the toes hurt. The same sometimes happens when I work from home...
Here's the catch: I came to realize many of these observations count for thesis-writing as well. The time pressure and the "now" might not feel that urgent while you write a chapter, but try to tap into that creativity zone, and I'm sure the words will start to fly onto the screen.
Showing posts with label TEDxDelft. Show all posts
Showing posts with label TEDxDelft. Show all posts
Ideas - and Feynman (TEDxDelft)
This blog was originally written live at TEDxDelft 2011
When I woke up this morning, all excited about today's event, I started thinking about "ideas worth spreading". Somehow, and not surprisingly, I thought of Richard Feynman. His way of thinking, and him being a top-notch scientist, are both a lasting inspiration and a close-to-home link to TEDxDelft

Feynman on the environment for ideas
In "Surely, you're joking Mr. Feynman", Feynman explains his way of working, developing ideas and the necessary conditions for developing ideas.
Feynman's way of working reflected his love for solving riddles. He loved breaking locks, solving puzzles and taking part radios. He loved a challenge as well, and was fueled by curiosity (when lecturing in Brazil, he ended up playing in a samba band).
When Feynman "got stuck" in research at a certain point, he saw a certain object falling down, and wanted to write down the equations of motion. Just the fact that he started working on "something", and he started developing equations again, he managed to get his thoughts and research back on track.
Feynman challenges the idea some scientists have that you need the ideal conditions to do great work:
When I was at Princeton in the 1940s I could see what happened to those great minds at the Institute for Advanced Study, who had been specially selected for their tremendous brains and were now given this opportunity to sit in this lovely house by the woods there, with no classes to teach, with no obligations whatsoever. These poor bastards could now sit and think clearly all by themselves, OK? So they don’t get any ideas for a while: They have every opportunity to do something, and they’re not getting any ideas. I believe that in a situation like this a kind of guilt or depression worms inside of you, and you begin to worry about not getting any ideas. And nothing happens. Still no ideas come. Nothing happens because there’s not enough real activity and challenge: You’re not in contact with the experimental guys. You don’t have to think how to answer questions from the students. Nothing!
In fact, Feynman told that he liked working from strip clubs and bars.
Understanding in order to build up an idea
When Feynman thought he could not understand another researcher's presentation and paper, his sister sent him upstairs with the paper and told him to work on it himself. When he started to break down the paper and work through it himself, equation by equation, he could understand and even take the ideas a step further. Some argue that he could not accept any idea at all, and that he needed to break everything down and then build it up from scratch in his own mind. Others write: "I think Feynman had a healthy respect for how our minds actually work — as opposed to how they might work if they were ideal reasoning machines."
Fully breaking down a concept into its core elements, understanding these elements and then using them for your own ideas, is a true challenge, but it is the fuel which drives ideas fundamentally progressing science and our society.
Feynman and TEDx
An example of how closely TED(x) and Feynman are related, can be seen here. The university where he spent most of his career, is organizing a TEDx event on Feynman's vision.
Also, Feynman's ideas just appeared a few moments ago in Leo Kouwenhoven's TEDxDelft talk.
When I woke up this morning, all excited about today's event, I started thinking about "ideas worth spreading". Somehow, and not surprisingly, I thought of Richard Feynman. His way of thinking, and him being a top-notch scientist, are both a lasting inspiration and a close-to-home link to TEDxDelft
Feynman on the environment for ideas
In "Surely, you're joking Mr. Feynman", Feynman explains his way of working, developing ideas and the necessary conditions for developing ideas.
Feynman's way of working reflected his love for solving riddles. He loved breaking locks, solving puzzles and taking part radios. He loved a challenge as well, and was fueled by curiosity (when lecturing in Brazil, he ended up playing in a samba band).
When Feynman "got stuck" in research at a certain point, he saw a certain object falling down, and wanted to write down the equations of motion. Just the fact that he started working on "something", and he started developing equations again, he managed to get his thoughts and research back on track.
Feynman challenges the idea some scientists have that you need the ideal conditions to do great work:
When I was at Princeton in the 1940s I could see what happened to those great minds at the Institute for Advanced Study, who had been specially selected for their tremendous brains and were now given this opportunity to sit in this lovely house by the woods there, with no classes to teach, with no obligations whatsoever. These poor bastards could now sit and think clearly all by themselves, OK? So they don’t get any ideas for a while: They have every opportunity to do something, and they’re not getting any ideas. I believe that in a situation like this a kind of guilt or depression worms inside of you, and you begin to worry about not getting any ideas. And nothing happens. Still no ideas come. Nothing happens because there’s not enough real activity and challenge: You’re not in contact with the experimental guys. You don’t have to think how to answer questions from the students. Nothing!
In fact, Feynman told that he liked working from strip clubs and bars.
Understanding in order to build up an idea
When Feynman thought he could not understand another researcher's presentation and paper, his sister sent him upstairs with the paper and told him to work on it himself. When he started to break down the paper and work through it himself, equation by equation, he could understand and even take the ideas a step further. Some argue that he could not accept any idea at all, and that he needed to break everything down and then build it up from scratch in his own mind. Others write: "I think Feynman had a healthy respect for how our minds actually work — as opposed to how they might work if they were ideal reasoning machines."
Fully breaking down a concept into its core elements, understanding these elements and then using them for your own ideas, is a true challenge, but it is the fuel which drives ideas fundamentally progressing science and our society.
Feynman and TEDx
An example of how closely TED(x) and Feynman are related, can be seen here. The university where he spent most of his career, is organizing a TEDx event on Feynman's vision.
Also, Feynman's ideas just appeared a few moments ago in Leo Kouwenhoven's TEDxDelft talk.
Space: Research and Tourism (TEDxDelft)
Posted by
Unknown
at
12:31 PM
I originally live-blogged this post from TEDxDelft
The first Dutch-born astronaut ever, Lodewijk van den Berg, gave an inspiring talk about research in space, and how he went from being a crystal growth scientist to becoming an astronaut.

From scientist to astronaut
The dilemma was: "Should we train a scientist specialized in crystal growth to become an astronaut, or should we make an astronaut study crystal growth?"
From thinking he would never have a chance to be selected because of his age and bad eyesight, Lodewijk van den Berg ended up becoming the prime crew member for the experiments on crystal growth in zero gravity. During his talk, he made the critical remark that for space travel and research, emotions override the rational considerations. The wish to participate in such research become stronger than the rational notion of the risks involved.
Being able to carry out research in zero gravity requires us to understand the effect of gravity on our lives and society. With some movies shot in space (showing a crew member in continuous rotation around his axis, and a bubble of grape juice, and the remark you need perfect table manners in space), Lodewijk van den Berg moved to the motion of fully living three-dimensional in space.
Satellites can be considered as the most basic device for the exploration of space, or wifi over very large distances. These devices allow us to make observations, but they are limited: they cannot carry out experiments. Humans in space, on the other, can both carry out experiments and serve as experimental animals, influencing the practice of medicine on Earth.
The necessary requirements for space research
Three elements are required for research in space:
1. A scientific base:
Obviously, you need to design experiments, understand the scientific issues involved and carefully prepare for an experiment.
2. Coordination:
One of the challenges is to make different groups, of different disciplines and different backgrounds and nationalities work together. A free flow of information is required.
3. Budget:
An adequate budget, sometimes providing research funding for several decades, is necessary to go from an "idea" to a "finished experiment".
Current problems and solutions
Nowadays, three regional groups dominate space research and exploration: US, Russia and the EU. Together, and with the help of Japan, Australia and Canada, they have contributed to the ISS, thus fulfilling the second criterion on coordination.
However, three problems are putting borders to the progress of space research:
1. Space shuttle:
The termination of the space shuttle program by the US cuts away one of the ways of transportation between Earth and the ISS.
2. Malfunction of the Russian spacecrafts:
Recently, mechanical problems with the Russian spacecrafts, has taken away the redundancy to get people up and down to the space station.
3. Decentralization of the European space program:
Instead of bringing the European researchers and scientists working on the space program together (and thus fulfilling the second criterion), the institutions are more and more being distributed over the different regions, and thus taking away the daily interaction between the major players in this field.
4. The crisis, always the crisis:
No money, no budget. Research, science and education are among the first victims of the crisis.
However, Lodewijk van den Berg had a positive message and solutions to these problems as well, and gave us an outlook on the future of the space program:
1. Commercial space travel
Soon, when commercial space travel will be available, a new stream of revenue will be created and this will create an additional source of funding for space research.
2. A real global view
We should think as a planet, not as rivaling nations anymore. The major players should open up and work together with China. A real global program, in which all research findings are shared is necessary. He suggest the creation of a UN space office, that really operates on a global scale. (This did remind me of when I watched the debate for the Republican nomination two weeks ago, in which all candidates were defending the idea of the US cutting back on its support to the UN). The only way to move forward is to create a planet-wide space program.
A personal note
As you might have noticed from my emphasis on this talk, I love everything related to space exploration. In fact, at the age of 18 , I was doubting between studying engineering in Belgium, or coming to Delft to study aerospace engineering.
Here's a few places where I've been, and which I highly recommend to everyone interested in rockets and space exploration:
1. Space Camp and the Euro Space Center
As a 10-year-old kid, I had a blast at the camp - and I would encourage all parents to send curious kids to this camp.
2. International Space Camp and the US Space and Rocket Center
My first trip to the US (I was 16 then) took me to Huntsville, AL, where I spent a week with students from all over the world, learning about space research, space missions and the work of astronauts. I went back to the US Space and Rocket Center when I was living in Atlanta, GA and I felt the same excitement I had felt 8 years before. I think every scientist, every engineer and every dreamer can't dislike a wonderful place like that.
3. Cape Canaveral
Bad planning and a lack of time resulted in me only seeing the outside of this holy place for space exploration, but passing by was still an inspiring moment.
4. Noordwijk
The closest to Delft, is the Space Expo in Noordwijk. If you haven't been there, and liked today's talk, you might like to go and visit. I remember enjoying it very much.
5. National Air and Space museum, DC
This museum is the most recent addition to my space-related trips and visits. I spent more than 4 hours there, reading and taking in sights of the rockets. If you're in DC, it's worth t stop by and learn.
The first Dutch-born astronaut ever, Lodewijk van den Berg, gave an inspiring talk about research in space, and how he went from being a crystal growth scientist to becoming an astronaut.
From scientist to astronaut
The dilemma was: "Should we train a scientist specialized in crystal growth to become an astronaut, or should we make an astronaut study crystal growth?"
From thinking he would never have a chance to be selected because of his age and bad eyesight, Lodewijk van den Berg ended up becoming the prime crew member for the experiments on crystal growth in zero gravity. During his talk, he made the critical remark that for space travel and research, emotions override the rational considerations. The wish to participate in such research become stronger than the rational notion of the risks involved.
Being able to carry out research in zero gravity requires us to understand the effect of gravity on our lives and society. With some movies shot in space (showing a crew member in continuous rotation around his axis, and a bubble of grape juice, and the remark you need perfect table manners in space), Lodewijk van den Berg moved to the motion of fully living three-dimensional in space.
Satellites can be considered as the most basic device for the exploration of space, or wifi over very large distances. These devices allow us to make observations, but they are limited: they cannot carry out experiments. Humans in space, on the other, can both carry out experiments and serve as experimental animals, influencing the practice of medicine on Earth.
The necessary requirements for space research
Three elements are required for research in space:
1. A scientific base:
Obviously, you need to design experiments, understand the scientific issues involved and carefully prepare for an experiment.
2. Coordination:
One of the challenges is to make different groups, of different disciplines and different backgrounds and nationalities work together. A free flow of information is required.
3. Budget:
An adequate budget, sometimes providing research funding for several decades, is necessary to go from an "idea" to a "finished experiment".
Current problems and solutions
Nowadays, three regional groups dominate space research and exploration: US, Russia and the EU. Together, and with the help of Japan, Australia and Canada, they have contributed to the ISS, thus fulfilling the second criterion on coordination.
However, three problems are putting borders to the progress of space research:
1. Space shuttle:
The termination of the space shuttle program by the US cuts away one of the ways of transportation between Earth and the ISS.
2. Malfunction of the Russian spacecrafts:
Recently, mechanical problems with the Russian spacecrafts, has taken away the redundancy to get people up and down to the space station.
3. Decentralization of the European space program:
Instead of bringing the European researchers and scientists working on the space program together (and thus fulfilling the second criterion), the institutions are more and more being distributed over the different regions, and thus taking away the daily interaction between the major players in this field.
4. The crisis, always the crisis:
No money, no budget. Research, science and education are among the first victims of the crisis.
However, Lodewijk van den Berg had a positive message and solutions to these problems as well, and gave us an outlook on the future of the space program:
1. Commercial space travel
Soon, when commercial space travel will be available, a new stream of revenue will be created and this will create an additional source of funding for space research.
2. A real global view
We should think as a planet, not as rivaling nations anymore. The major players should open up and work together with China. A real global program, in which all research findings are shared is necessary. He suggest the creation of a UN space office, that really operates on a global scale. (This did remind me of when I watched the debate for the Republican nomination two weeks ago, in which all candidates were defending the idea of the US cutting back on its support to the UN). The only way to move forward is to create a planet-wide space program.
A personal note
As you might have noticed from my emphasis on this talk, I love everything related to space exploration. In fact, at the age of 18 , I was doubting between studying engineering in Belgium, or coming to Delft to study aerospace engineering.
Here's a few places where I've been, and which I highly recommend to everyone interested in rockets and space exploration:
1. Space Camp and the Euro Space Center
As a 10-year-old kid, I had a blast at the camp - and I would encourage all parents to send curious kids to this camp.
2. International Space Camp and the US Space and Rocket Center
My first trip to the US (I was 16 then) took me to Huntsville, AL, where I spent a week with students from all over the world, learning about space research, space missions and the work of astronauts. I went back to the US Space and Rocket Center when I was living in Atlanta, GA and I felt the same excitement I had felt 8 years before. I think every scientist, every engineer and every dreamer can't dislike a wonderful place like that.
3. Cape Canaveral
Bad planning and a lack of time resulted in me only seeing the outside of this holy place for space exploration, but passing by was still an inspiring moment.
4. Noordwijk
The closest to Delft, is the Space Expo in Noordwijk. If you haven't been there, and liked today's talk, you might like to go and visit. I remember enjoying it very much.
5. National Air and Space museum, DC
This museum is the most recent addition to my space-related trips and visits. I spent more than 4 hours there, reading and taking in sights of the rockets. If you're in DC, it's worth t stop by and learn.
Live blogging at TEDxDelft
Just a quick note: I'm live blogging from TEDxDelft today - and trying to keep a good shot of science and inspiration together.
All articles will appear here
All articles will appear here
Creating history – TEDxDelft 7 november 2011
De ontwerpster van het mooiste boek ter wereld. De kristalonderzoeker die per ongeluk astronaut werd. De vrouw die de regels voor hoogtechnologisch draagmoederschap aan de kaak stelt. De kwantumwetenschapper die atomen aan de andere kant van de wereld kan omdraaien. De kunstenaar die van pvc-buizen beesten maakt die zelfstandig kunnen bewegen. De student die in zijn vrije tijd foto’s maakt van 12 kilometer hoogte. Allemaal schrijven ze geschiedenis. Allemaal vertellen ze hun verhaal op TEDxDelft.
Op TEDxDelft delen 20 sprekers hun history created volgens de beproefde TED-formule. Een TEDx is een ervaring waarvan je niet eens wist dat je die gemist had. Als partner van TEDxDelft nodig ik je van harte uit hierbij aanwezig te zijn. Je kunt je aanmelden via deze link: www.tedxdelft.nl/tickets Tot ziens op 7 november!
I just registered for TEDxDelft and I am totally looking forward to the first TEDx event I'll be attending! More info on TEDxDelft
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
